Roulette is one of the oldest casino games. It has its origins in the 18th century and was developed by Blaise Pascal. Roulette is the French word meaning little wheel. For as long as the game has been around there have been people who have claimed that they can “beat the wheel.” Ed Thorp and Claude Shannon developed the first wearable computer in that was used to predict wear the ball would land. Others took the success of the Thorp/Shannon initiative and used it to Delhi Bazaar Satta King develop scaled down and non-computer based methods of predicting the final resting basket of the ball. The degree at which each is successful vary greatly. The best system I have seen in print is the Professional Roulette Prediction series by Laurence Scott. With the success of the time tested professional players and mathematicians there is a group of people that take observations out of context and make broad and vague assertions. I will take a look at some of the more outrageous roulette myths and debunk why they are so absurd. For further advance roulette strategy reading, you can visit Frank Scoblete’s Ultimate Roulette Strategy Guide, that he published exclusively at 888casino.com
The most 5 Common Roulette Myths
Myth 1
Myth: The outcome of the previous spin impact the outcome of the next spin?
This misconception is widely popular among tourist and novice gamblers. Many amateur roulette players have likely seen only 1500-2000 croupier spins over their playing time. Most of these have been on different wheels and by different croupiers. Even if a player were to record the numbers that come up, and if the number set were to show a biased toward a specific octant -a group of 8 numbers that are adjacent to one another on the Joka Casino wheel, the information would not be significant for a few reasons.
The first reason is that result of the outcome is dependent on numerous physical characteristics. Some are dealer dependent and some are characteristics of the wheel itself. In addition to these, there are other variables that are not even considered. These included elevation, humidity, and rotation of the earth and gravitational forces. In order for the set of numbers to show any reasonable conclusions the data set would have to be in the neighborhood of 30,000 spins, all under the exact same conditions. This is impossible.
Truth: The previous spin does not affect the outcome of the next spin over the long term.
Myth 2
Myth: All Roulette Wheels behave in the same
The assertion that all roulette wheels behave the same way is the most amusing assertion I’ve heard. Considering there are 2 versions a roulette wheel, an American wheel: where there are a 0 and a 00 basket and a European wheel: where there is only a 0 basket, the very nature of the duplicity leads any reasonable person to conclude their must be at least two versions. The American wheel has 38 slots and carries a house edge of 5.25%. The single zero roulette wheel has a house edge of 2.7%. The very nature of the different number of slots dictates that the behavior is different.
The physical characteristics of the wood and steel used on the wheels vary from wheel to wheel. The different in the coefficients of friction and tensile strengths vary slightly per batch. The slight differences in the physical property of the materials used do not individually make a difference but when combined with all the other variances the result becomes logarithmic. It is very likely that 2 wheels produced on the same day by the same person will be very different.
indiasatta 